Does high asset divorce have to be adversarial?

The mindset individuals have when they enter proceedings for ending their marriages could have considerable impacts on their cases. For instance, if a Tennessee resident chooses to use a high asset divorce as time for revenge, the case can become complicated quickly. On the other hand, if a person decides to move forward amicably, the case could go more smoothly. In the latter scenario, changing the language of divorce may help.

A psychologist writing for Psychology Today recently looked at the connection between language and divorce proceedings. The article states that the adversarial language often used in divorce proceedings could affect individuals’ behavior and the way they approach their cases. Using the term “parties” to refer to the divorcing couple seems dehumanizing, and the words “petition” and “summons” seem confrontational.

Many of the phrases seem to pit one person against another. For instance, legal representation often uses the phrase “opposing counsel” to refer to the other person’s attorney, which can make it seem like a fight is taking place with the other spouse being an opponent. While each person certainly has outcomes he or she wants to achieve, divorce cases do not necessarily have to turn ugly.

Even in high asset divorce cases, individuals can work together and enter into their proceedings with an amicable mindset. Certainly, these types of cases often prove more complex, but legal options are available for Tennessee residents who want their cases to move forward as smoothly as possible. Consulting with their legal counsel may help concerned individuals understand how to set themselves on the right path from the beginning.